Religious Belief Leads To Violence, Aggression
Published by Greg March 13th, 2007 in Spirituality, Atheism and Religion, Commentary
I’ve mentioned this before, but I thought it would be good to supply the entire press release from
the University of Michigan:
ANN ARBOR, Mich.—Reading violent scriptures increases aggressive behavior, especially among believers, a new study finds. The study by University of Michigan social psychologist Brad Bushman and colleagues helps to illuminate one of the ways that violence and behavior are linked.
“To justify their actions, violent people often claim that God has sanctioned their behavior,” said Bushman, faculty associate at the U-M Institute for Social Research and lead author of the article published in the March 2007 issue of Psychological Science. “Christian extremists, Jewish reactionaries and Islamic fundamentalists all can cite scriptures that seem to encourage or at least support aggression against unbelievers.”
Bushman, who is also a U-M professor of psychology and communications studies, and colleagues at Brigham Young University and at Vrije University in the Netherlands, found the same relationship in two separate experiments detailed in the article.
The first study involved Brigham Young University students, 99 percent of whom believed in God and in the Bible. The second study involved Amsterdam students, 50 percent of whom believed in God and 27 percent of whom believed in the Bible.
After reporting their religious affiliations and beliefs, participants read a passage adapted from the King James Bible that described a woman’s brutal murder and her husband’s revenge on her attackers. Half the participants were told that the passage came from the Old Testament, half that it came from an ancient scroll found by archeologists. Half the participants from each of these groups read a version of the passage that included a sentence in which God commanded his followers to take arms against others.
After reading the passages, participants were paired with confederates of the experimenters for a simple reaction task. They were told that the winner would be able to “blast” the losing partner with noise as loud as 105 decibels, about the level of a fire alarm—a common experimental measure of aggression.
The researchers found that both the religious and secular students were more aggressive, delivering louder blasts of noise to their ostensible partners, when told that the passage they read came from the Bible. Aggressive responses also increased when participants read that God directly sanctioned violence. The increased level of aggression was greater among believers than among secularists, however.
“Our results further confirm previous research showing that exposure to violent media causes people to behave more aggressively if they identify with the violent characters than if they do not,” Bushman said.
The work also supports the view that exposure to violent scriptures may induce extremists to engage in aggressive actions. “It’s important to note that we obtained evidence supporting this hypothesis in samples of university students who were, in our estimation, not typical of the terrorists who blow up civilians,” Bushman wrote. “Even among our participants who were not religiously devout, exposure to God-sanctioned violence increased subsequent aggression. That the effect was found in such a sample may attest to the insidious power of exposure to literary scriptural violence.”
According to Bushman and colleagues, this does not mean that reading the scriptures leads to aggression. “Violent stories that teach moral lessons or that are balanced with descriptions of victims’ suffering or the aggressor’s remorse can teach important lessons and have legitimate artistic merit. But taking a single violent episode out of its overall context, as we did in these studies, can produce a significant increase in aggression.”
I have to say I’m a bit disappointed with the remark by Bushman at the end. It is in direct conflict with his findings. This is the deep, underlying problem with religion: It is a socially violent force, and people feel threatened if they do not condone it even in circumstances when criticism it is called for.
[click the picture for a review of the depicted book.]






From the small amount of evidence I can glean from this commentary and clicking on the book and reading what comes up, the main conclusion I come to is: This is a very small and shallow study to justify the publication of an entire book. Seem more like a preliminary study to me. “Aggressive responses also increased when participants read that God directly sanctioned violence. The increased level of aggression was greater among believers than among secularists, however.” Yes, but it went up also for the secularists, even if not as much. But hold on here, look at the samples: “The first study involved Brigham Young University students, 99 percent of whom believed in God and in the Bible. The second study involved Amsterdam students, 50 percent of whom believed in God and 27 percent of whom believed in the Bible.” So we draw our religious and non-religious groups from completely different societies. That seems pretty weird to me. However, to really understand it all I would probably have to read the book, and the report given to date does not make me think investment in this particular bit of literature will be money well spent. On the other hand, you really don’t need a study to show that religion will cause violence. A short look at history or current events is more than enough.
The book and the study are not linked. The study is the study, and the book is something I happen to know about and liked the picture as a graphic to illustrate this posting.
I agree that there is a problem with the sample being from two different societies, but it remains valid as long as certain things are taken into consideration, mainly that the hypotheses are formulated correctly. Say you wanted to compare the attitudes of traditional cattle keeping people with the attitudes of stock brokers. You could not get the two samples from one society. This could be thought of as a study comparing people living in a society where the majority believe that they live in a christian culture vs. a more secular society …. to do that you need two different countries (but maybe canada would be better than netherlands)